VIDEO: Arizona Cop Runs Over a Suspect with Police Cruiser Excessive Force

The video below shows the dash cam video footage from the police car of an officer who used his vehicle to run over a man instead of using less force. The officer actually gases on it and puts the pedal to the metal before running the suspect down and blasting through a concrete wall without knowing if anyone was on the other side. Someone could have easily been killed due to the reckless behavior of this officer and yet people like Nancy Grace (who I usually agree with) want this cop to get a medal for running down a guy who was committing crimes that is true however, he never physically assaulted or touched anyone or committed a physically violent crime against another person. This is excessive use of force without a doubt in my mind with no justification. Nancy Grace I almost always agree with you but when it comes to this situation and this story YOU ARE WRONG!

Another thing that I will say is that this man never pointed the gun he was carrying at anyone. He fired it into the air and the only time he pointed it away from the air was when he put the gun under his chin in a suicidal moment in which another officer was able to talk him down from. The video below shows more of what occurred in this incident. We all need to come together as Americans and civilians and stop with the racial division. There are good cops out there and there are bad cops out there and if we all band together we can get these bad cops out of the system. This is a case where we actually have the audio and the video to be objective and see if we believe there is excessive use of force unlike in the Baltimore situation occurring as I post this article where evidence is being hidden and reports are being kept from the people. I just wonder what is it going to take for us to stand up and say not no but hell no to the officers that want to violate our civil rights and turn our police force back to a community police force where the officers protect and serve us since after all we pay their salary. I think that since we pay the salary for police, mayors, etc, then we should see all the evidence in a case, we should be able to say that we no longer want a particular officer on the police force anymore, and we need to remember that again we pay their salary!

It has not been a good month for police “infractions” caught on tape: whether it is a cop shooting an unarmed suspect just because, or a cop shooting an unarmed suspect because “a taser was confused with a gun”, the latest grotesque act caught on dashcam is the following video taken on February 19 showing a police cruiser slamming into an alleged crime suspect, Mario Valencia, holding a gun (however not aiming it at anyone and certainly not the police) at a speed of about 50 mph from behind, in what was clearly a move intended to kill the suspect.

Miraculously, the suspect survived. Ironically, the Police in Marana, Arizona, where the dashcam video was taken,claim that they saved the suspect’s life. His lawyer, understandably, strongly disagrees.

“Everything in the video seems to point towards an obvious excessive use of force. It is miraculous that my client isn’t dead,” said attorney Michelle Cohen-Metzger.

That said, the video of the incident has stirred debate about what type of force police should have used to detain a man with a gun.

As CNN recounts, in one video, an officer who was tailing Valencia at slow speed reports over the radio that the suspect has fired one round in the air with a rifle he is accused of stealing that morning from a Walmart.

Another patrol car zooms past, runs into the man from behind then hits a short cinder block wall next to a driveway. Video from Officer Michael Rapiejko’s camera shows the officer running the man over and the windshield smashing as the car hits the wall.

“Oh Jesus Christ. Man down,” the officer in the first car says.

Police in Marana, which is about a half-hour from Tucson, have justified Rapiejko’s actions.

The police, as has now become the norm, will either shoot, or run suspects over, and ask questions later.

“If we’re going to choose between maybe we’ll let him go a little bit farther and see what happens, or we’re going to take him out now and eliminate any opportunity he has to hurt somebody, you’re going to err on the side of, in favor of the innocent people,” Police Chief Terry Rozema said. “Without a doubt.”

At least according to the Police, the suspect was engaged in a series of extended crimes before his read end’s fateful encounter with the Arizona police cruiser.

Tucson Police Sgt. Pete Dugan told CNN that Valencia was involved in several incidents in Tucson the day he was struck. At 6:45 a.m., Valencia robbed a 7-Eleven in Tucson with a metal object in his hand. Authorities said he was dressed only in his underwear. He was charged with theft.

A little more than an hour later, police said, Valencia set a fire at a church for which he was charged with arson of an occupied structure.

Just after that he entered a home and stole a car, police said.

Authorities said he drove to a Walmart where he stole a .30-30 rifle and ammunition. He fled the store with Walmart employees in pursuit.

It is here that things get “liquid.” Valencia, police said, walked away from the officer, turned a corner and stopped. Valencia pointed the rifle at the officer then walked away again toward a Coca-Cola bottling plant and another business.

None of that is on the tape. What is visible is the next part of the police report: “Brunenkant also said by phone that before Rapiejko’s encounter with Valencia, the suspect had pointed the rifle at his head multiple times and threatened suicide before fleeing.

In other words, the driver of the police cruiser decided to take matters into his own hands and potentially kill someone with clearly… suicidal tendencies?

Valencia’s attorney was livid: “My client’s back was turned and the officer drove right into him,” she said. “It isn’t that dissimilar to a police officer shooting a fleeing suspect in the back.”

However, as recent events have demonstrated, shooting a fleeing suspect in the back is an all too normal occurrence.

Appearing later on CNN, a former NYPD officer Harry Houck said: “What if that (suspect) walks into somebody, maybe taking a potential hostage, maybe just shooting somebody.” After a man fires a gun in the air, officers have to make a decision how to detain the man, Houck said. Do they surround him with their cars and get in a gun battle? That would risk the lives of officers and bystanders, he said.

“I’m 100% behind this officer,” Houck said.

Well, that’s what cops do: they stand behind each other; they only shoot and drive at 50 mph into non-police officersfrom behind.

Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent, told Cooper the suspect had to be stopped but not with a vehicle running into him.

And the understatement of the day: “I have to question this tactic a bit,” he said. “I think setting up a secure perimeter and at least making some attempt to negotiate may have been far more efficient.”

Then again what has become quite apparent in recent months, is that America’s increasingly militarized and weaponized police force, has also become Judge Dredd-ized, and is meant to not uphold the law and preserve the peace, but also to serve as judge, jury and exectuioner all at the same time. And hope that nobody is recording.

I want to see this officer kicked off the force which is what most of the residents in this community want especially when you look at the history of this officer. Again when is enough going to be enough and we will take our country back and bring back the old police force that actually did SERVE and PROTECT.

Leave a Reply and Tell Me Your View or Take on This Story

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s